Australian Honors system/Robert Cornall AO/ Skanky Helen Daniels
What is the citeria for Australian Honors system?
Considering that corruption and corrupt conduct is rampant in Government departments it is also interesting that the Commonwealth Ombudsman Colin Neave is an AM and Robert Cornall is an AO so the criteria in these awards would overlook that both of these public servants have protected corruption and corrupt conduct.
Part of the criteria must be how many Government Minister's arses they have licked and kissed!!!
Well, we in Australian have all kinds of fuckers who have letters after their names because they believe they are distinguished people.
Clearly the Fucker Robert Cornall who was secretary in the Attorney Generals Department is one of them...... and just how does the Governor General hand out these awards and what is the critria?
The Australian Public Service Commissioner , the corrupt Steven Sedgwick who is protecting corruption in Government agencies ask the fucker Cornall to do an investigation into a complaint from a whistleblower......... again this clearly is a conflict of interest because the fucker Cornall had worked as a public servant and therefore had a motive to cover-up this whistleblower complaint .
It also should be noted that the Attorney General department where Cornall was secretary also is protecting corruption at ITSA or now AFSA. Helen Daniels,the skanky bitch who is assistant secretary of the Law branch has been given extensive evidence of this and instead of exposing it has chosen to protect it.
Open and Shut
To: fionabrown01@hotmail.com
Open and Shut
FOI coverage of Governor General's Office off to High Court
Posted: 16 Aug 2013 12:40 AM PDT
I
hear that the High Court granted leave to appeal today in the Kline
case concerning Freedom of Information coverage of documents about the
operation of the Australian Honours system. More when the transcript
appears.
A long line of decisions in the case to date have all gone the Governor General's way, the most recent a unanimous decision of the Federal Court that gave broad interpretation to the exemption from the act for documents held by the Office of the Governor General that relate to matters of an administrative nature.
The recently released Hawke Report rejected submissions that the FOI act should be amended to broaden the scope as it applies to the Office of the Governor General, but gave no reasons (p 64), recommended that the parliamentary departments should be subject to the act to the same extent, and while citing the Federal Court decision by name gave no attention to the Court's interpretation of the relevant words "relates to matters of an administrative nature" (p 62) and its narrowing effect.
A long line of decisions in the case to date have all gone the Governor General's way, the most recent a unanimous decision of the Federal Court that gave broad interpretation to the exemption from the act for documents held by the Office of the Governor General that relate to matters of an administrative nature.
The recently released Hawke Report rejected submissions that the FOI act should be amended to broaden the scope as it applies to the Office of the Governor General, but gave no reasons (p 64), recommended that the parliamentary departments should be subject to the act to the same extent, and while citing the Federal Court decision by name gave no attention to the Court's interpretation of the relevant words "relates to matters of an administrative nature" (p 62) and its narrowing effect.
No comments:
Post a Comment