Tuesday 28 August 2012

ITSA FOI Discosure Log

Freedom of information disclosure log

Printer friendly printout
Subsection 11C(3) of the Freedom of Information Act 1982 requires agencies to publish on their websites details of information released pursuant to FOI request received by them (other than documents referred to in subsection 11C(1), which includes personal information about a person or information about the business, commercial, financial or professional affairs of a person, if it would be unreasonable to publish the information). In accordance with those requirements, set out below are descriptions of such information/documents released by ITSA. Information attached to, or referred to in, ITSA’s disclosure log will generally be removed after 12 months, unless the information has enduring public value.
Date access grantedFOI request sought access toDocuments released
5 April 2012Web browser and social media use guidelines or policies
ITSA is committed to upholding the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0. Work is underway across the Australian Government to achieve compliance in line with the Web Accessibility National Transition Strategy.

There are documents in the disclosure log that are currently not available in HTML format. If you would like hard copies of any documents shown above or assistance accessing them, please contact ITSA’s FOI coordinator at foi@itsa.gov.au or

FOI Coordinator
Insolvency and Trustee Service Australia
GPO Box 821
CANBERRA ACT 2601
We will try to meet reasonable requests for an alternative format of the document in a timely manner and at the lowest reasonable cost to you. You will be notified if any charge is payable and required to pay the charge before the information is provided.

Page Last Updated: 03/05/2012    
Contact us |  Online feedback form |  Privacy Policy |  Disclaimer & Copyright  

Austraian Fderal Police accepts no responsibility for invstigation standards




Subject: RE: Breaches of the AGIS and negligence of the AFP [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 14:19:37 +1000
From: No-Reply@afp.gov.au
To: FIONABROWN01@HOTMAIL.COM

UNCLASSIFIED

Reference is made to your correspondence to the Australian Federal Police (AFP) dated 12 August 2012 regarding your enquiry about AGIS.

The AFP is the primary law enforcement agency responsible for investigating crimes against the Commonwealth of Australia. From the information you have provided, it appears that no relevant Commonwealth offences have been committed and therefore the matters raised cannot be investigated by the AFP.

The AFP does not hold overarching powers over other Commonwealth Agencies. 

You may wish to contact the Commonwealth Ombudsman.  Their contact details can be found at www.ombudsman.gov.au

A copy of your correspondence has been recorded by the AFP.



NCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

From: Commissioner
Sent: Sunday, 12 August 2012 3:09 PM
To: Mackell, Tamerra
Subject: FW: Breaches of the AGIS and negligence of the AFP


-------------------------------------------
From:
fiona brown[SMTP:FIONABROWN01@HOTMAIL.COM]
Sent:
Sunday, August 12, 2012 3:09:19 PM
To:
Commissioner
Subject:
RE: Breaches of the AGIS and negligence of the AFP
Auto forwarded by a Rule

Re AGIS
.Dear Commissioner Negus,
 I refer to the following email to which I have received no reply.
I will ask you again and make it clear to you what I am seeking.
 What safeguards have the Australian Federal Police  put in place that Australian Government Agencies comply with  Australian Government Investigation standards?
Again this is another example of the incompetence of the Australian Federal Police who posses no obvious  powers in Australia.
Please could you advise me  how the Federal Police also  intend to  monitor this taking into consideration clear lack of foresight?
As with my previous email I remind you that should this matter go to court you will be subpoenaed to justify why the Commonwealth Ombudsman and the Australian Public Service Commission are able to protect  systemic corrupt conduct in Government Agencies using the investigation methods that you have revised.  
Thank you
Fiona Brown 

From: fionabrown01@hotmail.com
To: commissioner@afp.gov.au
Subject: Breaches of the AGIS and negligence of the AFP
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2012 12:43:42 +1000

 
.Dear Mr Negus,
I understand  the Australian Federal Police has been involved  in a programme which has revised the  IGIS, or Australian Government Investigation standards.
 You will be aware this is a requirement under the Financial and Accountability Act.
I am also aware all Government Agencies involved in this must complete training programmes.
However, Internal noncompliance with legislation in Government Agencies have allowed systemic corrupt conduct to flourish.
This is particular in the Insolvency Trustee Service, Commonwealth Ombudsman and the Australian Public Service Commission.
It is clear now that although investigation standards do exist there is no safeguard that agencies comply with them.
I am  now refer to section 4.8
Agencies are to refer any matters to the AFP for possible investigation where there is substantial evidence of criminal activity or suspected criminal activity by a member of an Agency fraud investigation , control prevention or compliance unit. The AFP will also consider investigating matters where there could  be a real or perceived conflict of interest if the matter were to be investigated by the Agency concerned(for instance , where the allegations concerns a member of the executive with some responsibility for the Agency's investigation function)
 The Insolvency trustee Service Australia is aware it's Principal Legal Officer Matthew Osborne is giving Legal Advice to Trustee that the Bankruptcy Act may be breached using S134(3). This gives discretion to  a trustee, however it is limited only to property realized.
According to Matthew Osborne this section gives a trustee discretion on all aspects of the Bankruptcy Act. It even extends to discretion as to misleading creditors.
Please would the Australian Federal Police  advise me what powers have been put in place by them when they are made aware of the serious breaches by a number of Government agencies of the AGIS to cover up atrocious misconduct.
If this matter should go to court  be aware I will  subpoena you  to give evidence  on your negligence .
Thank You
Fiona Brown



**********************************************************************
                                WARNING

This email message and any attached files may contain information
that is confidential and subject of legal privilege intended only for
use by the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.   If you
are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for
delivering the message to the intended recipient be advised that you
have received this message in error and that any use, copying,
circulation, forwarding, printing or publication of this message or
attached files is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the
information contained therein. If you have received this message in
error, please notify the sender immediately and delete it from your
inbox.

AFP Web site: http://www.afp.gov.au
**********************************************************************



From: fionabrown01@hotmail.com
To: commissioner@afp.gov.au
Subject: Breaches of the AGIS and negligence of the AFP
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2012 12:43:42 +1000



.Dear Mr Negus,
I understand  the Australian Federal Police has been involved  in a programme which has revised the  IGIS, or Australian Government Investigation standards.
 You will be aware this is a requirement under the Financial and Accountability Act.
I am also aware all Government Agencies involved in this must complete training programmes.
However, Internal noncompliance with legislation in Government Agencies have allowed systemic corrupt conduct to flourish.
This is particular in the Insolvency Trustee Service, Commonwealth Ombudsman and the Australian Public Service Commission.
It is clear now that although investigation standards do exist there is no safeguard that agencies comply with them.
I am  now refer to section 4.8
Agencies are to refer any matters to the AFP for possible investigation where there is substantial evidence of criminal activity or suspected criminal activity by a member of an Agency fraud investigation , control prevention or compliance unit. The AFP will also consider investigating matters where there could  be a real or perceived conflict of interest if the matter were to be investigated by the Agency concerned(for instance , where the allegations concerns a member of the executive with some responsibility for the Agency's investigation function)
 The Insolvency trustee Service Australia is aware it's Principal Legal Officer Matthew Osborne is giving Legal Advice to Trustee that the Bankruptcy Act may be breached using S134(3). This gives discretion to  a trustee, however it is limited only to property realized.
According to Matthew Osborne this section gives a trustee discretion on all aspects of the Bankruptcy Act. It even extends to discretion as to misleading creditors.
Please would the Australian Federal Police  advise me what powers have been put in place by them when they are made aware of the serious breaches by a number of Government agencies of the AGIS to cover up atrocious misconduct.
If this matter should go to court  be aware I will  subpoena you  to give evidence  on your negligence .
Thank You
Fiona Brown

Saturday 25 August 2012

FOI ITSA

Under Freedom of Information I have requested a copy of ITSA's Investigation policy and also what qualifications Adam Toma and Mark Findlay   have attained to do investigations as required under the Australian Government Investigation Standards.
As the APSC has no investigation policy it could be reasonable to  assume that ITSA also do not have one.
This is not to be confused with ITSA's complaint handling policy where Mark Findlay and all the Dumb Fucks working for Bankruptcy Relations are fucking everyone over on the advice of Matthew Osborne.
Taking into consideration Karin Fisher and Commissioner Steve Sedgwick from the APSC  is protecting the Agency Head of ITSA  Veronique Ingram it will be interesting what else I uncover under FOI.

Senator John Williams


Senator John Williams is the NSW National Party Senator  who has an interest in the Insolvency Trustee Service Australia where Veronique Ingram is fucking everyone over. This pursuit may be noble but anyone contacting Senator Williams is only being told half the story of  what is occurring.
Simply put this is like having sex without the orgasm!!
Instead of putting their heads up their arses the staff at Senator Williams office should be informing anyone that is complaining about ITSA what is actually occurring.

First of all, Matthew Osborne Principal Legal Officer at ITSA is adving  trustees that S134(3)  allows them to breach the Bankruptcy Act.
Go to the Bankruptcy Act.....................
 
 After 128N.   Definitions ..... you will see the heading Division 4--Realization of property 
this section  runs from S129-S139 and deals with realization of property. It does not give discretion to the trustee to mislead or fuck anyone over as fucking Matthew Osborne  is informing trustees.
This section is limited. It is easily misread if you fail to look at the headings.
Did Senator Williams tell you all this???? I think not........

Friday 24 August 2012

Email Foi Apsc No Investigation Policy

Following is a copy of an email sent requesting information under FOI sent to the Australian Public Service Commission.
The Australian Public Service Commission has confirmed they do not have an investigation policy and no qualified investigators.
No complaints are under S16 or S41(f) are handled by qualified investigators as the APS has decided that this is not warranted. 
This allows Commissioner Sedgewick to fuck everyone over and abuse office.

So come kiss my fucking Arse  Commissioner Sedgwick!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!








From: fionabrown01@hotmail.com
To: foi@apsc.gov.au; chris.luton@apsc.gov.au
Subject: FOI
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 19:56:59 +1000

Dear Chris
Thank  you for supplying me with a copy of the Australian Public Service Fraud control plan and your accompanying letter explaining that the Australian Public Service finds it unnecessary to have an investigation policy pursuant to the AGIS. You also informed me that Commissioner Steve Sedgwick or Karin Fisher or in fact nobody in the Australian Public Service Commission has any qualifications to do investigations as required by the AGIS.
I understand that the Australian Public Service Commission would contract a suitably qualified investigator to undertake enquiries in accordance with the guidelines.
Under Freedom of Information please supply me with the name of the individual or the name of the Company that the Australian Public Service  Commission uses when complaints are received from Whistleblowers under S16 of the Australian Public Service Act and also S41(f) of the Australian Public Service Act.
I would assume that the Australian Public Service would attempt to avoid a conflict of interest and appear to be transparent when dealing with these matters. It would be an abuse of Office and power should it be found that the Australian Public Service Commissioner deliberately protected Agency Heads and failed to comply with the AGIS by failing to use qualified investigators.
You may be aware that Fairwork Australia was criticized this week by KPMG for lack of qualified officials who had no standards to follow and failed to investigate key areas.
The correspondence in the form of emails I received under Freedom of Information sent to Veronique Ingram Head of ITSA and Alison Larkins Acting Commonwealth Ombudsman was sent by Karin Fisher and not a qualified investigator as required under the AGIS. From this it can only be assumed that the Australian Public Service Commission considers that extensive evidence of systemic corrupt conduct by senior management at the Insolvency Trustee Service Australia to be extremely minor or Commissioner Sedgewick has made a decision that this must be covered up at all costs.
         Earlier I also requested a copy of the emails or letters that were sent to the respective Agency  Heads when a complaint had been received under S16 or S41(f) of the Australian Public Service Act. This would have been the  first or initial contact that would have been made. I  understand for privacy reasons all names would be blacked out . I requested under FOI a copy of all these initial contacts in the financial year 2009-2010 and 2010-2011. I believe I received confirmation that none of these emails or letters exist. I therefore find this particularly confronting that  of all the complaints made to the Australian Public Service Commission in the particular time span the complaint made by me was the only complaint that the  Karin Fisher actually contacted the Agency Heads asking them to explain their behavior. If this is correct it would show a complete lack compliance with the AGIS.
This is taken from the 2010-2011 APS Annual report:

Whistleblowing reports and other allegations

APS employees are able to report alleged breaches of the Code of Conduct to their agency head or a person authorised by the agency head.
Whistleblowing inquiry functions are handled by delegated senior staff in the Ethics Group, with the Commissioner reserving for his personal consideration matters that raise serious public interest issues.
During 2010–11, the Commissioner received 14 whistleblowing reports from APS employees and three complaints from former public servants. Table 4 shows the number of cases received and finalised. Four complaints were carried over from 2009–10. All whistleblowing reports were acknowledged and many substantially responded to within six weeks.
The complaints from public servants concerned poor administration, the handling of internal investigations, and allegations of misconduct by senior managers including allegations of bullying and harassment.
Eleven matters were finalised in 2010–11, including two of the four matters carried over from the previous year. Table 4 also shows the action taken by the Commissioner in response to these cases. The one investigation undertaken found that there was insufficient evidence to warrant recommending an investigation into an alleged breach of the Code of Conduct. In most cases, however, the employee was advised to refer the matter to the relevant agency head for investigation.
While the number of whistleblowing reports lodged is low, they often concern complex interpersonal matters and the issues can take a long time to assess, including whether any or all of the matters have been investigated by the agency in the first instance.
The Commissioner also handled 16 allegations against agency heads made by APS employees and members of the public under section 41(1)(f) of the Public Service Act 1999 (PS Act). The complaints commonly featured allegations that agency decision-makers had failed to comply with their legislative obligations or not exercised their decision-making powers properly. Only one of the ten cases finalised warranted an inquiry.
.You will be aware that Commissioner Steve Sedgwick has abused Office in this circumstance.
I will now be specific what I require under Freedom of Information.
*********Please supply me with the name of the investigator or the Company  which the APS uses for  investigating all complaints made under S16 and S41(f) of the Australian Public Service Act.
*********As I cannot believe that no emails or letters were sent to Agency Heads when a complaint was made asking for an initial explanation except  for the complaint that was made about ITSA or the Commonwealth Ombudsman by myself could you again verify this for me. If this proves to indeed be correct I would unfortunately be very concerned that the correspondence I received under FOI from Karin Fisher was a forgery.
I would appreciate confirmation of this email.
Thanking you
Fiona Brown

Karin Fisher APSC Head of Ethics

Karin Fisher is Head of Ethics at the Australian Public Service Commission.
So............................ Karin Fisher come kiss my fucking Arse!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!





Is it derelict of duty or Fraud  that this fucking skank is protecting systemic corrupt conduct at the Commonwealth Ombudsman and by the other skank Veronique Ingram head of the Insolvency Trustee Service Australia.

The Australian Public service Commission have admitted they do not have an investigation policy.
This allows Karin Fisher and the faggy Steve Sedgwick to fuck over everyone who makes a complaint.
Fairwork Australia was criticized this week  for also failing to have an investigation policy.
How many  Government Agencies also do not have one?
Under Freedom of Information  the Investigation policies of ITSA and the  Commonwealth  Ombudsman were sought. As yet I have had no response.
ITSA is using S134(3) to fuck everyone over.  Mathew Osborne is giving this advise to all Trustees.
When he told me this he thouht I was a TRUSTEE. I had to ask him twice because I did not believe what I heard the first time.
Extensive evidence was provided to the Commonwealth Ombudsman who did a deal with ITSA to cover the matter up.
Under S  41(f) of the APS Act the Commissioner is required to look into such breaches of the APS  Act.
The  Australian Public service made a deliberate decision that they would cover this matter up which is abuse of Office.
 
so Karin Fisher( Ethics) and Steve Sedgwick( Commissioner) come kiss my ARSE and now it has been  exposed you have no fucking investigation policy  you can also fucking lick my Arse all over.

Saturday 18 August 2012

Colin Neave /Administrative reveiw Council/Commonwealth Ombudsman

Australia has now got a new shonky Commonwealth Ombudsman Colin Neave who replaced Alison Larkins who was acting in the role of the Commonwealth Ombudsman. As the Banking Industry Ombudsman Colin Neave only investigated 18% of complaints. This clearly shows this faggert is unfit to become Commonwealth Ombudsman

Alison Larkins was referred to the Australian Public Service Commissioner in December 2011 under section 41(f) of the Ombudsmans Act for breaches of the  APS Code of conduct  and non compliance of the Ombudsmans Act.

The Australian Public Service Commissioner Steve Sedgwick attempted to cover this matter up and fuck over anyone who made a complaint and had the necessary evidence of  systemic corrupt at  Commonwealth Ombudsman.
In fact the APS Commissioner received 33 similar complaints from whistleblowers and  referrals under s41(f) and he fucked over all of them but one.
Under FOI it was revealed that the AGIS are not applied by either the Commonwealth Ombudsman or the .Australian Public Service Commission. This allows serious systemic corrupt conduct to flourish in Government Agencies.
Coin Neave as a former Banking industry Ombudsman would be aware of this systemic corrupt conduct and was involved in it and applied it as banking Ombudsman
Part of the selection panel who appointed  Colin Neave to this position was the Australian Public Service Commission.
How fucking funny............... Australia now has another shonkey  Commonwealth Ombudsman  who is clearly aware of how Government Agencies  fuck  people over by failing to comply with the Acts for which they are responsible and  fail to comply with the APS Code of Conduct. The APS  who fucks anyone over who complains about Agency Heads was part of the process. Who's arse did Colin Neave kiss in the APS to get them to select him.
It is a fact that Steve Sedgwick Commissioner of the APS is corrupt.

As Banking Industry Ombudsman Colin Neaves fucked over people who complained about the Banking industry... how many more will he fuck over as Commonwealth Ombudsman???????

Friday 17 August 2012

Serious misconduct at the Commonwealth Ombudsman

In the Commonwealth Ombudsman's Annual report 2010-2011 there were 579 complaints about the Commonwealth Ombudsman. 324 were trashed as would be expected to try and hide their fuck-ups though 223 were found to need further investigation.
Taking this into consideration that the  Ombudsman found that they had fucked up 223 complaints themselves , the Commonwealth Ombudsman failed to complete any further investigations which would show a complete lack of compliance with Australian Government Investigation Standards. This would also show  an attempt to cover up serious non compliance with the Ombudsmans Act and also an attempt to fuck over Australians who complained about the Commonwealth Ombudsman protecting Government Agencies.

Wednesday 15 August 2012

OAIC FOI Commonwealth Ombudsman

From: fionabrown01@hotmail.com
To: enquiries@oaic.gov.au
Subject: RE: Freedom of Information
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 09:59:36 +1000


To whom it may concern,
I have attempted to obtain a copy of the  Commonwealth Ombudsmans investigation policy under FOI  This is a requirement that must be met by Agencies under the Financial Management and Accountability Act. I have as yet  received no reply or  acknowledgement from them although I have contacted them by email on 2 occasions .
Following is a copy of the emails sent to them.
Thank you
Fiona Brown



From: fionabrown01@hotmail.com
To: ombudsman@ombudsman.gov.au
Subject: RE: Freedom of Information
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 14:23:56 +1000

To whom it may concern,
On the 22nd July I requested a copy of the Commonwealth Ombudsmans Investigation Policy under FOI. This is a requirement under the Financial and accountability Act. As  yet I have received no response.
Thank you
Fiona Brown


From: fionabrown01@hotmail.com
To: ombudsman@ombudsman.gov.au
Subject: Freedom of Information
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 20:09:47 +1000

To whom it may concern,
Under Freedom of Information I am requesting a copy of the your agency's investigation policy. This is a requirement under the Financial Management and Accountability Act.
I will remind you what this contains:
S1.1 Investigation Policy

::A statement regarding the agency's objectives in carrying out its investigation functions and use of sanctions.

:: a clear definition of activities applicable to the Agency to which the AGIS apply. This should include a description of compliance activities that are not generally considered investigations by the agency.

::A statement regarding the agency's responsibility to manage matters that are considered minor or routine and

:: A statement regarding the agency responsibility to refer criminal matters to the Australian Federal Police. This should include considerations of joint agency investigation teams where appropriate.
Also under FOI I would like to be given in writing what level of Investigation training or qualification that Kent Pervis has received. Also I am requiring the same of Margaret Chinnery Diane Merryfull and Alison Larkins
I am also particularly interested if your investigations policy require all applicable Acts be complied with.
Thank you
Fiona Brown


Email 2 Australian Federal Police Commissioner



From: fionabrown01@hotmail.com
To: commissioner@afp.gov.au
Subject: RE: Breaches of the AGIS and negligence of the AFP
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 15:09:19 +1000


Re AGIS

.Dear Commissioner Negus,
 I refer to the following email to which I have received no reply.
I will ask you again and make it clear to you what I am seeking.
 What safeguards have the Australian Federal Police  put in place that Australian Government Agencies comply with  Australian Government Investigation standards?
Again this is another example of the incompetence of the Australian Federal Police who posses no obvious  powers in Australia.
Please could you advise me  how the Federal Police also  intend to  monitor this taking into consideration clear lack of foresight?
As with my previous email I remind you that should this matter go to court you will be subpoenaed to justify why the Commonwealth Ombudsman and the Australian Public Service Commission are able to protect  systemic corrupt conduct in Government Agencies using the investigation methods that you have revised.  
Thank you
Fiona Brown 

From: fionabrown01@hotmail.com
To: commissioner@afp.gov.au
Subject: Breaches of the AGIS and negligence of the AFP
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2012 12:43:42 +1000




.Dear Mr Negus,
I understand  the Australian Federal Police has been involved  in a programme which has revised the  IGIS, or Australian Government Investigation standards.
 You will be aware this is a requirement under the Financial and Accountability Act.
I am also aware all Government Agencies involved in this must complete training programmes.
However, Internal noncompliance with legislation in Government Agencies have allowed systemic corrupt conduct to flourish.
This is particular in the Insolvency Trustee Service, Commonwealth Ombudsman and the Australian Public Service Commission.
It is clear now that although investigation standards do exist there is no safeguard that agencies comply with them.
I am  now refer to section 4.8
Agencies are to refer any matters to the AFP for possible investigation where there is substantial evidence of criminal activity or suspected criminal activity by a member of an Agency fraud investigation , control prevention or compliance unit. The AFP will also consider investigating matters where there could  be a real or perceived conflict of interest if the matter were to be investigated by the Agency concerned(for instance , where the allegations concerns a member of the executive with some responsibility for the Agency's investigation function)
 The Insolvency trustee Service Australia is aware it's Principal Legal Officer Matthew Osborne is giving Legal Advice to Trustee that the Bankruptcy Act may be breached using S134(3). This gives discretion to  a trustee, however it is limited only to property realized.
According to Matthew Osborne this section gives a trustee discretion on all aspects of the Bankruptcy Act. It even extends to discretion as to misleading creditors.
Please would the Australian Federal Police  advise me what powers have been put in place by them when they are made aware of the serious breaches by a number of Government agencies of the AGIS to cover up atrocious misconduct.
If this matter should go to court  be aware I will  subpoena you  to give evidence  on your negligence .
Thank You
Fiona Brown