Thursday, 13 November 2014

It looks like the Dodgy Australian Federal police are trying their best yet again to fuck everyone over. From Peter Colvin telling the Australian Public they were now going into policing piracy and downloading of music and movies because this fucker has no idea about anything to the Commander Glen McEwen of the Australian Federal Police Cyber crime unit who arrested Mathew Flannery for being the leader of LulzSec

Clearly this fucker from the Australian Federal along with Peter Colvin show that the AFP has no idea on nothing!!!!!!

Commander McEwen said he did not back away from his comments that Flannery was a risk to Australian society..

Terrorism is the worst crime we face: AFP

DAVID BARBELER
AAP
NOVEMBER 13, 2014 10:02PM

POLICE have defended a proposal to give them easier access to unprecedented powers by claiming terrorism is greater than any other crime.

AUSTRALIAN Federal Police assistant commissioner Neil Gaughan wants streamlined access to control orders, he told a parliamentary committee reviewing the foreign fighters Bill on Thursday.

Control orders, which must be issued by a court, impose obligations and restrictions on a person to protect the public from terrorism.

The order may include a curfew, wearing an electronic monitoring tag, restrictions on communications, regular reporting to police, and a range of other measures.

But they're controversial.

They have only been sought and issued twice since their introduction in 2005 - to Jack Thomas and David Hicks.

The UK abolished its control order regime in 2011.

The AFP wants to streamline the process of applying through the attorney-general to save time and paperwork.

When asked by the committee why the AFP needed control orders instead of arresting and prosecuting terrorist suspects, Mr Gaughan replied there was a legal hole when it came to the admissibility of foreign collected evidence.

"In a perfect world, I agree, we would be arresting people," he said.

"If we don't have sufficient evidence for beyond reasonable doubt to get a prosecution, this provides us another alternative."

When asked by Senator Penny Wong why that wasn't an argument for lowering the threshold for a range of other crimes, Mr Gaughan replied: "Because I think the impact of terrorism on the Australian community is distinctively greater than any other crime we face."

The reply startled a number of the federal politicians present, with deputy Labor leader Tanya Plibersek asking Mr Gaughan to repeat himself.

"The impact on the Australian community of a terrorist attack, in my view, will have a greater impact than any other crime.

"In relation to public confidence, morale and how people respond."

Deputy Chair Anthony Byrne then put the following to Mr Gaughan: "Be truthful. Just say what (this request) is instead of this piecemeal rubbish.

"You've got an emergency situation ... you've got an agency that's struggling to cope ... you've got control orders that in the past haven't been used, so what you're doing is you're desperately trying to find a legal mechanism that you can use to disrupt or prevent terrorism?

"Correct," Mr Gaughan replied.

Saturday, 1 November 2014

Meta Data, the AFP Commissioner and a whole lot of shit!!!!
So on thursday dinosaur Australian Federal Police Commissioner Andrew Colvin who obviously has no fucking idea about the internet said that the meta data that internet companies were now required to keep for 2 years would be used to track down people who pirated movies and music. Clearly this fucker did not realize that in fact copyright was not a criminal offence even though he holds the position of Top Cop in Australia.
Then on Friday Colvin backed down on his threat because someone had mentioned to him that this was actually none of the fucking AFP's business.
Considering that any hacker wanting to download pirated movies or music would use a proxy server in a far away country and therefore hide their tracks and anyone that has turned to "THE DARK SIDE" will do the same who is the AFP and the Australian Parliament think they are going to catch with these new laws??????
It appears Abbott is just sucking up to Obama and Colvin is just a puppet who has no fucking idea what so ever!!!!!!

Friday, 31 October 2014

Ian Lazar engaged in criminal activity for a decade, court told

This is the jewish shonk along with his father Rabbi David Rogut
threatened to take me to court for exposing his many court cases on the internet because in their very simple minds it was ANTISEMITIC!!!!!!!! REALLY????????

Date: October 31, 2014 - 5:15PM

Nick Ralston

Crime Editor

View more articles from Nick Ralston

Follow Nick on Twitter Follow Nick on Google+ Email Nick

Ian Lazar was arrested on Thursday for allegedly defrauding an elderly woman whom he saw on A Current Affair. Photo: Police Media

A colourful Sydney financier accused of defrauding an elderly woman of her home has engaged in criminal activity for a decade, a court has been told.

Ian Lazar appeared before Sydney's Central Local Court on Friday charged with obtain financial advantage by deception after being arrested on Thursday outside the North Sydney apartment block where he lives with his pregnant fiancee.

Police allege that the 43-year-old lender of last resort fraudulently obtained ownership of the elderly woman's Nambucca home after he saw her detailing her financial woes on A Current Affair in July 2003.

During a bail application the court heard that Mr Lazar's alleged victim was 88 years old at the time of the offence and that after she was evicted in 2009, she died homeless.

Police prosecutor Sergeant Vanessa Robichaux told the court that Mr Lazar was part of a "larger criminal organisation" and there were a number of other victims of the group.

A number of Crown witnesses had also been threatened about coming forward to make complaints, she said.

The court was told that police will allege Mr Lazar has been engaging in criminality for 10 years.

But Mr Lazar's barrister, Richard Mitry, told the court if that was the case then police should have arrested him earlier.

Mr Mitry said his client had instead been the victim of a campaign against him by police and the media which was fuelled by disgruntled investors who couldn't afford to repay Mr Lazar.

He also denied that Mr Lazar was part of a criminal group, telling the court that many of those to whom he is alleged to have links were engaged in legal disputes with him.

Mr Mitry said Mr Lazar should be granted bail because he had known for "two to three years" that he was the subject of a police investigation and had not fled during that time.

But Magistrate Mark Buscombe refused bail, saying Mr Lazar posed a an unacceptable risk as he was concerned about allegations that threatening emails had been sent to a potential witness.

Police will allege that after seeing the woman on A Current Affair, Mr Lazar contacted the show, claiming to be backed by community-minded investors who wanted to pay off the woman's debts as an act of generosity.

After being put in touch with the woman it is alleged that Mr Lazar and an associate made arrangements to pay off the woman's debts.

But when she went to sell her home in 2006 and move to the Southern Highlands to be closer to family she discovered the property had been transferred into the name of a company she did not know.

When she contacted Mr Lazar she was told there had been a mix-up and that it would be resolved. But it was not and in 2009 she was evicted from her home.

The case against Mr Lazar returns to court in January.

Thursday, 30 October 2014

Leading prosecutor Margaret Cunneen and her eldest son investigated for allegedly perverting course of justice

Date: October 30, 2014 - 1:07PM

96 reading now

Every dog has its day and the day is coming for dodgy

prosecutor Margaret Cunneen who protected

the pervert Scott Volkers

Michaela Whitbourn

Investigations reporter

View more articles from Michaela Whitbourn

Follow Michaela on Twitter Email Michaela

Margaret Cunneen: accused of perverting the course of justice. Photo: Peter Rae

The corruption watchdog has revealed it is investigating one of the state's top prosecutors over allegations she perverted the course of justice, in a move that will send shockwaves through the legal community.

The Independent Commission Against Corruption said on Thursday that it would hold a public inquiry into allegations that deputy senior Crown prosecutor Margaret Cunneen, SC, and her son Stephen Wyllie counselled his girlfriend, Sophia Tilley, to "pretend to have chest pains" to prevent police officers from obtaining evidence of her blood alcohol level at the scene of a car accident on May 31 this year.

The commission is investigating whether this was done "with the intention to pervert the course of justice".

Car crash: Sophia Tilley and Stephen Wyllie. Photo: Stephen Wyllie/Facebook

Ms Tilley allegedly took the advice.

The public inquiry will start on Monday, November 10, and is expected to run for three days.

"As this matter involves a senior public official involved in the administration of justice in New South Wales, the Commission considered it appropriate for a person from outside New South Wales to preside at the inquiry," the commission said in a statement.

Queensland barrister Alan MacSporran, QC, a former Queensland Parliamentary Crime and Misconduct Commissioner has been appointed an assistant commissioner to preside at the public inquiry.

Counsel assisting the commission will be Sydney barrister Michael Fordham, SC.

Former premier Barry O'Farrell appointed Ms Cunneen to preside over the special commission of inquiry into claims of interference in police investigations of alleged paedophile priests in the Hunter region.

Attorney-General Brad Hazzard said on Thursday that the Director of Public Prosecutions, Lloyd Babb, SC, had "advised me that in discussions with Ms Cunneen, SC, she has agreed that it is appropriate for her to stand aside and to have no active involvement in any current prosecution or future prosecution until the resolution of the ICAC hearing whereupon the situation will be reviewed".

"It is important to recognise that any individual appearing before ICAC has the presumption of innocence and Ms Cunneen, as with any other NSW citizen, has an absolute entitlement in that regard," Mr Hazzard said.

"The matter will now proceed through the normal processes of ICAC."

Dodgy Whitehouse Design School gives the Shonky Australian Prime Minister's Daughter a $60,000 scholarship.

Clearly this is in the Public interest that this be exposed!!!!!

The Dodgy Prime Minister Tony Abbott has an equally dodgy daughter!!!!

The Sydney student who leaked information about a fashion school scholarship controversially awarded to the daughter of Prime Minister Tony Abbott sincerely believed she was acting in the public interest and was unaware she was breaking the law.

Freya Rachael Sommerville Newman, 21, used her position as a part-time librarian at the Whitehouse Institute of Design to obtain information about the $60,000 director's scholarship awarded to Frances Abbott in 2011.

Ms Newman pleaded guilty last month to accessing restricted data. The offence carried a maximum penalty of two years' jail.

At a sentencing hearing in the Downing Centre Local Court on Thursday, Ms Newman's barrister, Tony Payne, SC, asked magistrate Teresa O'Sullivan to place the university student on a bond and not record a conviction due to the "significant extra-curial punishment" she had suffered since becoming a whistleblower.

He said she was experiencing anxiety due to the high level of media coverage her case had generated and a psychiatric report was tendered in support of this, although Ms O'Sullivan agreed to suppress sensitive parts of it.

"A sense of injustice motivated Ms Newman, not greed or a desire for notoriety or to embarrass Ms Abbott," Mr Payne said.

"She was not aware that her actions were against the law or that her identity would become known."

Mr Payne said Ms Newman had heard some senior Whitehouse staff members talk about the Managing Director's Scholarship Ms Abbott had been awarded by the institute's founder Leanne Whitehouse in February 2011. At the time, Mr Abbott was the leader of the opposition.

It was with their "knowledge and encouragement" that Ms Newman used the user name and password of another staff member at the institute to access its student record system, without the staff member's knowledge.

A police facts sheet alleged Ms Newman then took screen shots of the information from the system and emailed two other institute employees, saying: " ... there's a bit about Frances meeting with Leanne J, the CEO of Whitehouse Institute on February 21, 2011 and then receiving a Managing Director's Scholarship three days later."

Soon after, she sent another email saying: "Got 'em – might go meet Chris now to talk tactics, see you tomorrow."

The police said this was a reference to Chris Graham, the editor and publisher of the New Matilda website, which published an article about Ms Abbott's scholarship the following day.

Ms Newman, a student at the University of Technology, Sydney, resigned from Whitehouse straight away.

Mr Payne said Ms Newman acknowledged accessing the database was a breach of her employer's trust, but "no significant harm" had befallen Ms Abbott as a result. Further, Ms Newman had sent a letter to Ms Abbott apologising for any distress.

He said Ms Newman was a "vulnerable young woman" who had inadvertently gained a reputation as a whistleblower, which would affect her education and employment prospects for years. A conviction would also restrict her ability to travel to some countries.

Because Whitehouse was a private school and not a public institution, Ms Newman was not protected under whistleblower legislation.

The Whitehouse Institute denied providing Ms Abbott with any special treatment.

Police opposed a bond and submitted that a conviction should be recorded.

Dozens of supporters, some bearing placards saying "Free Freya" and "Protect Whistleblowers", turned up at court, although Mr Payne said his client had taken no part in any of the campaigns that had sprung up in response to her case.

Ms Newman, who was accompanied by her parents, will be sentenced on November 25

Thursday, 23 October 2014

" Wrongful arrests in Australia/ List of cases[edit...":

This is from a reader of my blogs.......

I was drugged as the Detective in Farah Jama's case was paid off by a man stealing millions from a will and this man abused my daughters terribly. I was charged with stalking after this man lied to police and constantly stalked me and I was incited to shout or email him and I just escaped jail but lost everything to corrupt lawyer John Alexander O'Brien who paid psych registrar Johannes K.L. Khor money to fake notes and lock me up and pretend I had bipolar and delusions and this was under the schemes of Detective Neil Beeson of Doncaster Police who made a false victim impact statement the day before sentencing and they wanted ten years for me and to throw my daughter back to a paedophil

Model Litigant Policy for Civil Litigation

Introduction

1.1 This Policy has been endorsed by Cabinet to assist in maintaining proper standards in

litigation and the provision of legal services in NSW. This Policy is a statement of

principles. It is intended to reflect the existing law and is not intended to amend the law

or impose additional legal or professional obligations upon legal practitioners or other

individuals.

1.2 This Policy applies to civil claims and civil litigation (referred to in this Policy as litigation),

involving the State or its agencies including litigation before courts, tribunals, inquiries

and in arbitration and other alternative dispute resolution processes.

1.3 Ensuring compliance with this Policy is primarily the responsibility of the Chief Executive

Officer of each individual agency in consultation with the agency’s principal legal officer.

In addition, lawyers, whether in-house or private, are to be made aware of this Policy and

its obligations.

1.4 Issues relating to compliance or non-compliance with this Policy are to be referred to

the Chief Executive Officer of the agency concerned.

1.5 The Chief Executive Officer of each agency may issue guidelines relating to the

interpretation and implementation of this Policy.

1.6 This Policy supplements but does not replace existing Premier’s Memoranda relating

to Government litigation, in particular Premier’s Memoranda nos. 94-25, 97-26, and

95-39.

The obligation

2. The State and its agencies must act as a model litigant in the conduct of litigation.

Nature of the obligation

3.1 The obligation to act as a model litigant requires more than merely acting honestly

and in accordance with the law and court rules. It also goes beyond the requirement

for lawyers to act in accordance with their ethical obligations. Essentially it requires

that the State and its agencies act with complete propriety, fairly and in accordance

with the highest professional standards.

3.2 The obligation requires that the State and its agencies, act honestly and fairly in

handling claims and litigation by:

a) dealing with claims promptly and not causing unnecessary delay in the

handling of claims and litigation;